That's inadequate, because it only covers one aspect of AGCs. Here are a few reasons to posibly use AGCs:
* Waze has thrown MP in recent memory for missing road
* path through AGC is sufficiently far from the main road(s) that you expect possible future MPs even if there are none now
* Traffic backs up and the turn instruction comes too late (may not be needed when Junction Box goes live)
* Theoretical gore extension line requires lane entry further back than instruction would indicate
* Presence of LGS/BGS
* Known GPS signalling issues
* Other need to add a unique instruction for a turn
* Waze has thrown MP in recent memory for missing road
* path through AGC is sufficiently far from the main road(s) that you expect possible future MPs even if there are none now
* Traffic backs up and the turn instruction comes too late (may not be needed when Junction Box goes live)
* Theoretical gore extension line requires lane entry further back than instruction would indicate
* Presence of LGS/BGS
* Known GPS signalling issues
* Other need to add a unique instruction for a turn
t0cableguy wrote:I think the rule for AGC's should be if the divider doesn't start more than xx feet before the stop line then it should not be mapped.
In some situations they are needed because of crazy intersection angles, but most of the time a true 90* intersection they do not provide anything additional.
NOO (drive this 2 days a week.. no way this needs any earlier prompt.
This one is directly south, and I have had an itch for a while to remove them... but no UR's so I leave it be.
Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro