Do you have tampermonkey for chrome (or greasemonkey for firefox) installed?Arnoniem wrote:Did you remove all Chrome extensions AND all tampermonkey/greasemonkey scripts?GarvinGray wrote:I uninstalled the old JAI and attempted to install your version. Still got the same message in chrome.
Sent from my S7 using Tapatalk
GarvinGray wrote:I uninstalled the old JAI and attempted to install your version. Still got the same message in chrome.
If you use chrome, you need tampermonkey...GarvinGray wrote:tampermonkey for chrome- no
greasemonkey for firefox- yes
Hello,itzwolf wrote:I've been meaning to post to ask if it would be possible for the junction angle information circle to be persistent over modified segments. I am sure you've likely experienced, as soon as a change is made the JAI circle falls underneath the red modified segments often making it tricky to see the angle information. As a work around I increase the font size considerably, however it still can be difficult to see in some circumstances.
I know the problem, I have already tested several things, playing on the position of the layers.
The problem is that the orange segments are part of the selection layer.
Result, if I place JAI above, we can not select anything.
So, no solution ...
For the grey bubbles?WazingArch wrote:May I suggest the following improvement to the script if you find it appropriate. I think it'd be helpful the script to fade away the info bubbles when arrows are faded away. Thus in certain cases, the info bubbles won't block visibility the same way as arrows.
With a check box, why not ... For let the choice to the editor;)
Hi,
The update is ready but I do not have my pc with me ...
Maybe tomorrow.
The update is ready but I do not have my pc with me ...
Maybe tomorrow.
Hi,DGolysh wrote:Hi guys!
if I want to contribute adding new language to this script, which repository should I fork? Is https://github.com/milkboy/WME-ja valid repository?
Contact me by PM.
It's OK for me after F5.RussPA wrote: Working for me also in Chrome. Double check your settings.
Have you the JAI checkbox in the layer menu ?dchary2418 wrote:It's not working for me, I verified the settings and I made it the only script running.
Hi!ituajr wrote:It appears that the U-turn avoidance conditions are not being evaluated correctly by JAI. The third condition is described in Preventing median U-turns as "In/out parallelism: The in and out segments (A and C) are within ±5° of parallel to each other."
The following screenshot shows that the yellow U-turn prevention" bubble is shown for in/out segments that are nowhere near parallel. The intermediate segment is 8 metres long. The test configuration is at Permalink, in South Australia.
JAI is version 2.0.8, running under Tampermonkey in Chrome Version 71.0.3578.98.
I think is the first time we see this case...
It's exactly that...herrchin wrote:Interesting example! It seems that JAI is simply evaluating each endpoint's turn angle independently and comparing their difference, presuming a mostly-straight median segment. To truly check for parallelism would require evaluating absolute directions of departure segments instead of relative angles between connected segments.
JAI calculates the angles formed by the node and the last geometry point of each segment
Here, in particular case, the segment has a length <15m
another example that we will never meet in real...
For now, the solution is to move the final geometry points.
Like this:
Like this:
Re: [Script] WME Junction Angle Info