Discussion for the unofficial, community-developed addons, extensions and scripts built for the Waze Map Editor.

The official index of these tools is the Community Plugins, Extensions and Tools wiki page.
Post by seb-d59
Arnoniem wrote:
GarvinGray wrote:I uninstalled the old JAI and attempted to install your version. Still got the same message in chrome.
Did you remove all Chrome extensions AND all tampermonkey/greasemonkey scripts?

Sent from my S7 using Tapatalk
Do you have tampermonkey for chrome (or greasemonkey for firefox) installed?
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
GarvinGray wrote:I uninstalled the old JAI and attempted to install your version. Still got the same message in chrome.
GarvinGray wrote:tampermonkey for chrome- no
greasemonkey for firefox- yes
If you use chrome, you need tampermonkey...
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
itzwolf wrote:I've been meaning to post to ask if it would be possible for the junction angle information circle to be persistent over modified segments. I am sure you've likely experienced, as soon as a change is made the JAI circle falls underneath the red modified segments often making it tricky to see the angle information. As a work around I increase the font size considerably, however it still can be difficult to see in some circumstances.
Hello,

I know the problem, I have already tested several things, playing on the position of the layers.
The problem is that the orange segments are part of the selection layer.
Result, if I place JAI above, we can not select anything.

So, no solution ...
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
WazingArch wrote:May I suggest the following improvement to the script if you find it appropriate. I think it'd be helpful the script to fade away the info bubbles when arrows are faded away. Thus in certain cases, the info bubbles won't block visibility the same way as arrows.
For the grey bubbles?
With a check box, why not ... For let the choice to the editor;)
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
Hi,
The update is ready but I do not have my pc with me ...
Maybe tomorrow.
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
DGolysh wrote:Hi guys!
if I want to contribute adding new language to this script, which repository should I fork? Is https://github.com/milkboy/WME-ja valid repository?
Hi,
Contact me by PM.
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
RussPA wrote: Working for me also in Chrome. Double check your settings.
It's OK for me after F5.
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
dchary2418 wrote:It's not working for me, I verified the settings and I made it the only script running.
Have you the JAI checkbox in the layer menu ?
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
ituajr wrote:It appears that the U-turn avoidance conditions are not being evaluated correctly by JAI. The third condition is described in Preventing median U-turns as "In/out parallelism: The in and out segments (A and C) are within ±5° of parallel to each other."

The following screenshot shows that the yellow U-turn prevention" bubble is shown for in/out segments that are nowhere near parallel.
The attachment JAI U-turn.JPG is no longer available
The intermediate segment is 8 metres long. The test configuration is at Permalink, in South Australia.

JAI is version 2.0.8, running under Tampermonkey in Chrome Version 71.0.3578.98.
Hi!
I think is the first time we see this case...
herrchin wrote:Interesting example! It seems that JAI is simply evaluating each endpoint's turn angle independently and comparing their difference, presuming a mostly-straight median segment. To truly check for parallelism would require evaluating absolute directions of departure segments instead of relative angles between connected segments.
It's exactly that...

JAI calculates the angles formed by the node and the last geometry point of each segment

Here, in particular case, the segment has a length <15m

another example that we will never meet in real...
JAI_exemple.png
exemple
(75 KiB) Downloaded 451 times
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message

Post by seb-d59
For now, the solution is to move the final geometry points.

Like this:
JAI_Exemple2.png
Exemple2
(84.22 KiB) Downloaded 443 times
seb-d59
Emeritus Local Champ
Emeritus Local Champ
Posts: 1897
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 625 times
Send a message