numbermaniac wrote: ↑Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:34 am The little popup box to inform me of 1.9.16 has a Changelog link, but when I click it, I get taken to a GitLab sign-in page; is that intentional? Seems like it might be linking to a private repository or something.

 

Thanks for letting me know. There was some changes in TB repository locations a bit ago and I missed removing that link. It'll be fixed in the next update.

RickyPV89 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:27 pm Hi guys, there is an issue with  new WME 2.92-9, it's reported here viewtopic.php?p=2215750#p2215750
The dropdown menu for speed cameras and "excess speed" field overlap each other with TB on.
Thank you!
 

 

Well isn't that just great?

Thanks, I'll look into it.

lg1992 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:10 am May I ask what's TIO?


 

TIO is Turn Instruction Override
 

Really enjoying the simple highlight of segments with lane guidance. A great addition for those of us that don't run the LG script all the time.

Feature request: I get the reasons why the fix revcons/dead end loops/etc function is restricted to R5+, but I was wondering if TB couldn't at least allow lower-ranked editors view them (I.E., let them be highlighted). Then such editors would see the big purple triangle with an exclamation mark in it and realize they need to Q/W (or otherwise disallow/allow all turns) on the junction node(s) in question.

I was informed by another that lower-ranked editors can't even see them highlighted, which is why I'm asking.

Thanks.

jm6087 wrote:They are not visible because technically revcons are not an issue and technically there is no reason to fix them.

Well.... They might technically not be an issue, but in the currently-running Raid, at least in my region, I've seen lots of people doing the whole revcon check thing (and being encouraged to do just that - make sure to Q/W as you divide and change to one-way, etc.). I'm thinking that it would be a lot more efficient if they could just see them so they don't have to try to just remember, and then make a request in Discord to have someone verify that the revcons got cleaned up (I.E. that they didn't miss any).

Besides, if they aren't an "issue," then there's no reason to "not" show them, either, right? You know, just for informational purposes.....

Finally, they might technically not be an issue, but cleaning them up would certainly hurt nothing, so...

jm6087 wrote:That is a regional decision to stress on revcons.
Personally I have no issues with it being visible to all and of course that will be up to Bruce in the long run but it is my understanding that as a national guidance, revcons do not have to be fixed.
That said, I do clean them up as I come across them but I never tell any editor that they have created any.

I clean them as I encounter them, and don't bother the editor who created them, either, since I know they probably aren't even aware of them. So we're on the same page there.

The Raid, on the other hand, has the potential to create a sea of revcons across the map. Sure, we can press a button to get rid of screensfull of them, but why not simply clean them as you go and then it's not a big project (which I'm guessing is the rationale for why it's being encouraged in my region (sure, as you say, they're not technically a problem currently, but they also really shouldn't be there if for no other reason than it's cleaner without them)). Since I see it happening in the Discord channel for my region, I figured there was no harm in asking for the feature.

I'm assuming that SkiDoGuy is the "Bruce" that you mention above (I don't know his name). I'll look forward to seeing his thoughts on the matter.

Ok, thanks for the info!

lg1992 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 3:09 am May I ask what's TIO?

 

Turn Instruction Override.
 
 
 
 

Lately, I've started to see this any time I do a page (re)load of the map:

https://i.postimg.cc/rFsM2wjr/Screenshot.png

Figured I should let someone know, in case this hasn't been reported yet.  I've verified that I'm running the current version (1.9.12).