Search oddity

Moderators: krankyd, Unholy

Re: Search oddity

Postby AlanOfTheBerg » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:31 am

Seems like it's working as expected: leave off details and it gives the closest match first; add more details and the further away stuff not in the same city gets filtered out. The only problem is the first match is missing the address, otherwise the distance matches exactly with the 2nd search.
Wiki Resources: Map Editing Manual | Oregon Project/To-Do List
Oregon-based US Country Manager | iPhone5 - VZ - iOS 7.0.6 | Waze v3.7.9.992
AlanOfTheBerg
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 19469
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: US Country Manager - Oregon, USA
Has thanked: 649 times
Been thanked: 2247 times

Re: Search oddity

Postby AlanOfTheBerg » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:32 am

Teddy2kk wrote:Are address searches in Waze completely reliant on Bing Maps results?

In the US and likely Canada, yes. Waze does not have a POI/address database internally and relies on multiple other search providers.
Wiki Resources: Map Editing Manual | Oregon Project/To-Do List
Oregon-based US Country Manager | iPhone5 - VZ - iOS 7.0.6 | Waze v3.7.9.992
AlanOfTheBerg
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 19469
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: US Country Manager - Oregon, USA
Has thanked: 649 times
Been thanked: 2247 times

Re: Search oddity

Postby AlanOfTheBerg » Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:16 pm

Teddy2kk wrote:I'm not worried about the results from thousands of km's away... I just don't understand why in the first example, it can't match the exact address like it does in the second example.

Yep, that's a good question. I wonder if it is client version-specific? Even if not, I suggest perhaps sending a ticket in via the Quick Help form on the Support page. After entering a decent subject line as the search criteria, click then "Send Email" button which really opens a support ticket.
Wiki Resources: Map Editing Manual | Oregon Project/To-Do List
Oregon-based US Country Manager | iPhone5 - VZ - iOS 7.0.6 | Waze v3.7.9.992
AlanOfTheBerg
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 19469
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: US Country Manager - Oregon, USA
Has thanked: 649 times
Been thanked: 2247 times

Search oddity

Postby AlanOfTheBerg » Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:36 pm

No.
Wiki Resources: Map Editing Manual | Oregon Project/To-Do List
Oregon-based US Country Manager | iPhone5 - VZ - iOS 7.0.6 | Waze v3.7.9.992
AlanOfTheBerg
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 19469
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: US Country Manager - Oregon, USA
Has thanked: 649 times
Been thanked: 2247 times

Re: Search oddity

Postby AndyPoms » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:22 am

What happens when you do those same searches in Bing Maps?
Image
Waze Champ & Forum Moderator
USA Country Manager
Senior Area Manager: State of Connecticut
Wiki: Editing | Best Practices | FAQ
AndyPoms
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 5925
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Hartford, CT
Has thanked: 89 times
Been thanked: 887 times

Re: Search oddity

Postby gfolk » Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:48 am

A little late here.

But, are the NA servers in Palo Alto (San Francisco bay area)? Then the originating IP address for the search will be from there. The listed results make sense if that's the case, the two closest results are the valley south of Sacramento and Santa Cruz. When that search was requested from a B.C. IP address, the intended address resulted.
Area Manager: Central Sierras from CA 49 (Georgetown to Mariposa) to US 395 (Reno to Lee Vining), and Monterey/Salinas/Hollister area

Image
gfolk
Beta tester
Beta tester
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Search oddity

Postby Teddy2kk » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:17 am

This happens pretty much every time I do a search in the Waze iOS client.

Let's say, for example, I want to navigate to 7556 Topaz Drive in Chilliwack, BC. In order to save keystrokes, I do a search for "7556 topaz", expecting that since there is an address in Chilliwack that matches this search, it should show that as a result. Instead, this is what I get:

Image

Along with other matches that are thousands of km's away, it doesn't match the exact address... it only matches the street name with no address.

If, however, I the amend search to include the city name (in this case "7556 topaz chilliwack"), it does in fact find the exact address as shown below:

Image

So if Waze can match the exact address when I include the city name in the search, why can't it match it in the less specific search results as well?
Teddy2kk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:46 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Search oddity

Postby Teddy2kk » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:27 am

If I have Bing Maps centred over Chilliwack and I do a search for "7556 topaz", it finds the exact address. Otherwise, it says that there are no results for the search.

Are address searches in Waze completely reliant on Bing Maps results?
Teddy2kk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:46 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Search oddity

Postby Teddy2kk » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:34 am

AlanOfTheBerg wrote:Seems like it's working as expected: leave off details and it gives the closest match first; add more details and the further away stuff not in the same city gets filtered out.


I'm not worried about the results from thousands of km's away... I just don't understand why in the first example, it can't match the exact address like it does in the second example.
Teddy2kk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:46 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time


Return to Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users