v ramci debaty v Client Expert fore sme odhalili, ze alternativne trasy su nejake divne, hlavne pri porovnavni shortest vs. fastest. pokusime sa to posunut skupine Routing Experts, toto je ich domena (co na to nasi routing experti?)
uvediem uryvok z debaty - moj pripevok:
uvediem uryvok z debaty - moj pripevok:
celkovo je este problem, ze shortest dava v pohode 3 alternativy a fastest nie (mne dalo 2, dalsiemu Portugalcanovi iba 1 - a pre shortest ma tiez 3 pre tu trasu)my preffered is faster all the time (not traveling via mountains) and I got several routes offered.
here are screenshots from client:
1. shortest routes table
2. shortest routes map
3. fastest route table
4. fastest route map
so what I got is:
the shortest #1 and the fastest #2 are almost the same, differences are most probably routes within cities... surprise is that shortest #1 is 49 and fastest #2 is 48.7 km (so shorter)... but I prefer faster #1 (unless there's heavy traffic)
what is also weird in this case, that the fastest #1 is not listed within shortest drives, even shortest #2 is longer by 1 km. but maybe this is caused by not having gps lock as sitting inside... will be worth to try with gps lock...
Re: Nefunkcni routovani