I have seen this done, yes. It can be confusing to untrained editors, though. It may be better to just have a parking lot landmark with few segments as the GPS reception under there is near useless.

Are you talking plot roads or landmark? We are not marking most parking lots with landmarks. Parking lots/car parks should be identified in foursquare which feeds the [P] icons to Waze.

I don't mark underground lots except maybe a short entrance/exit plot segment at appropriate locations but then only if I'm seeing URs or other routing issues due to the lack of such segments.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

daknife wrote:Are you talking plot roads or landmark? We are not marking most parking lots with landmarks. Parking lots/car parks should be identified in foursquare which feeds the [P] icons to Waze.

I don't mark underground lots except maybe a short entrance/exit plot segment at appropriate locations but then only if I'm seeing URs or other routing issues due to the lack of such segments.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Could you please point to a particular park so that I could get the idea how to deal with that in a conventional way?