davidg666 wrote:Oh yes - I meant that the graphs should show the local time of the city for each graph, not that they should adjust the time for the user looking at the graph - who could be anywhere anyway.
That way, it would be easier to compare graphs for different cities in different time zones - it looks a little awkward when a city outside your timezone appears to have its evening rush between 1800 and 2000 instead of 1700 and 1900. I expect this will become more important if you add more cities that are further apart.
davipt wrote:Speaking on which, what is the current timezone at the moment? UTC?
dmcconachie wrote:No need for smoothing, just a moving average addition to the charts.
fotrik wrote:Thanks to grateful permission from Waze and with big help of guri211 I would like to announce the lauch of new unofficial statistics website http://wazestats.com. Currently, the european capitals and few other locations around are monitored for active users every 5 minutes wich interesting charts of most active ones. We plan to add few other places and statistics soon. Enjoy and try to be better than your neighbours!
fotrik wrote:BTW, I am writing down all your requests for new cities like Edinburgh or Istanbul. When the background mechanism (also timezone etc.) is finalized, we will try to add more - where we see sufficient activity and up to the capacity of the server.
Users browsing this forum: MarioGPena