ncc1701v wrote:CrackedLCD wrote:doctorkb wrote:I can't see where it has been asked... Which browser, OS and versions of both are you running?
Browser: Chrome 27.0.1453.15 beta-m
OS: Windows XP SP 3
Hmm. I didn't even realize I was in the beta channel for Chrome! (It's not my primary browser, Opera is.)
Is Chrome beta working for you? I also have Chrome beta (and Ghostery) and scripts have recently stopped working.
AlanOfTheBerg wrote:When the uturn feature was enabled in the editor, there was no change to the data anywhere. Any selfcons which existed before would now show as an allowed uturn, whether locked or unlocked.
Timbones wrote:gohamstergo wrote:Have you heard of the "[enhanced]" version of your script? What exactly does it mean by "show all bad junctions?" What would your script not normally show?
These would be highlighted nodes that aren't on Primary roads (or higher). I took the decision not to show these, except when a segment was highlighted.
iknietjij wrote:Works wonders, just have to figure out some time to make it a crx now.. annoying chrome update.
top_gun_de wrote:PhantomSoul wrote:+1 on the option to highlight segments <10m and 10-15m. Its useful to supress u-turns on narrowly divided highways where a direct u-turn is prohibited.
the 15m-limit under which the routing never does a U-turn is easily forgotten when splitting roads. Therefore, highlighting segments of less than 15m would be a good idea.
sketch wrote:I've also heard "10m" mentioned for U turn prevention. So that could be it.
Kuhlkatz wrote:When unsplitting roads that does not meet the requirements and was split a while ago, having the speed info at hand makes decisions on which segments to keep much easier. You cannot always go by editor name and creation date of the segments in this case.
Kuhlkatz wrote:doctorkb wrote:Except that unsplitting shouldn't result in the removal of any roads... when you follow the instructions here:
https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Best_map_edi ... -Way_Roads
That section is to preserve the House numbering.
I'm referring to mostly main arterials in suburbs that usually has very little or no house numbers assigned to it (in my case). In this case I'd prefer to keep the original speed info for both A->B and B->A on the original segments instead of merging the 2 and polluting the A->B and B->A for the resulting segments after the unsplit & merge.
If you merge them the 'Wiki way' to retain the House Numbering, only the speed info for the longest of the 2 segments seems to be preserved, which looks like it screws up historic data for either the A->B or the B->A if one of the newly added segments was the longest.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users