Get a sneak peek at whats next for Permanent Hazards on our April 7th Office Hours!
You MUST read the "[Guidelines] How to request and search for new features" before posting here.

If you think you've found a BUG, use the appropriate WME version release thread found in the Waze Map Editor forum (parent of this forum).
Post by Thortok2000
Well, for starters, every time it says (if attached) in regards to parking lots and such. If you had the add-a-shape, you wouldn't have to worry about it being attached, or crossing roads. You could draw the shape on one side of the road and then draw the shape on the other side and they'd be linked.

As for cutout, what about parks that include a lake? The cutout would work great with the water layer, to give it enough room to show up. (Unless water layer already overrides park landmarks, I don't know.)

It also says in the standards to not classify anything within a landmark as a different landmark (even if it would qualify for such) because it's already inside the larger landmark. Cutout applies to that too, cut out enough space that you can classify the landmark on the inside correctly.

Essentially, my point is that the current standards are based around the limitations of the current system. Were there to be additional abilities such as cutout and add-a-shape, I'm sure the standards would change to reflect that.
Thortok2000
Area Manager
Area Manager
Posts: 722
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Send a message

[img]https:///tdL1sG[/img][img]https:///ubk1Zx[/img]
Area Manager of Greenville, SC! ^_^

Post by Thortok2000
Actually that wasn't what I meant but that sounds pretty handy too, basically landmarks that snap to the borders of other landmarks. But it does mean that the client wouldn't see a gap between them and it would be one solid block.
Thortok2000
Area Manager
Area Manager
Posts: 722
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Send a message

[img]https:///tdL1sG[/img][img]https:///ubk1Zx[/img]
Area Manager of Greenville, SC! ^_^