OyyoDams wrote: CTGreybeard wrote:
And, if you will allow me, I have one other report ... this node
is removed by unneeded junctions and, yet, when it does, toolbox reports that the two segments are "same connexion" segments. As I don't fully understand the implication of same connexion segments I am unsure if this is a real problem or not.
Well now unneeded junctions shouldn't remove this node anymore. If you remove it, you have 2 segments which are connected to same starting and ending nodes. The navigation algorithm doesn't like that.
I've heard you say this a few times in the support of this tool, however I've not seen any discussion of it on the forums. Can you point me to where this has been identified as an issue by anyone other than yourself?
petervdveen wrote:There are more scripts that have technical problems when using them together.
I'm happy this script warns about it on forehand.
Also about the decision to ban the remove unnecessary junctions function temporary was a good one.
The function was (I hope it is fixed now) really buggy with a lot of problems.
It had potential to ruin the map in a lot of places.
You know, given the abilities that OyyoDams has, I'm sure he could have just prevented that particular feature from working, rather than basically saying "you can't use that toy in my sandbox".
It isn't a *warning* -- it's a flat-out disabling of the script and any ability to edit at all until one or the other is disabled.
I'm very impressed with the improvements OyyoDams is making to the functionality of Addons, within Toolbox. And the fact that it now does everything that Addons does/did, I'm ok disabling the old in favour of the new.
OyyoDams: PLEASE don't do this again if you decide that JNF or Highlights or URO does something you think it shouldn't. This wouldn't be as big of a deal if a person could choose to not upgrade to the latest version -- but alas, upgrades happen automatically with no advance notice.