kentsmith9 wrote:So the numbers are tagging the order in which the check was added
Right, those are check IDs. You may use them to reference the check on the forum or in the Search->Reported as field, since the check titles are translated to different languages now.
kentsmith9 wrote:I don't think we want to spend too much time constantly updating a Wiki page that will require reformatting of that data.
That is what I was trying to say. My first intention was to put the list on the wiki, but now I'm OK with the result. The order is not a problem and could be changed easily.
nhanway wrote:Any one know how big of an area Validator generates a report for?
The area you can see at zoom 0 in your browser.
No thank you. It took me about ten seconds to think of a valid example
that would violate this.
Sure there are exceptions... I just meant the check #94 is designed to analyze the beginning of the name, so those [ENSW] can't be implemented in that check at the moment.