Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable roads

Moderator: Unholy

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bart99gt » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:37 am

davielde wrote:
irowiki wrote:So a US highway should be a major highway regardless of FC?

Not exactly. It would be a major highway minimum, but if FC has it as a freeway, keep it as a freeway.

If FC has it as a minor arterial (or less if that ever happens), it would always be upgraded to major highway under the new rules.


FWIW, US-51 in N Mississippi has several stretches where it is classified as a primary collector. It parallels I-55 for most of its length.
Image
Mississippi State Manager
Memphis, TN Area Manager

Mississippi Wiki Pagehttps://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Mississippi
bart99gt
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bart99gt » Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:36 am

davielde wrote:
bart99gt wrote:FWIW, US-51 in N Mississippi has several stretches where it is classified as a primary collector. It parallels I-55 for most of its length.

The goal of the automatic upgrade to MH minimum for US routes was to have a consistent "resolution" level, which is the pruning concept discussed elsewhere as part of the FC rollout. A US route collector (actually any collector) classified as a Primary Street segment will not be considered apart from the first or last 15km of a short route or 50km for a longer route. Major Highways do not have that limitation, and they help better reflect the "network" that makes up the US highway system. The upgrade to MH doesn't mean that Waze would prefer the collector portions of US-51 over another potentially faster road, but it would at least consider them for longer routes.

Unless as a collector it routes someone through a fire swamp or is filled with rodents of unusual size, it sounds like it may be a good bypass for I-55 if someone has "avoid highways" (freeways) enabled. Waze would be more willing to use it for longer distance travel or detours as a MH if it's deemed faster than any other route. Keeping it as PS may end up routing such a user way out of the way even if US-51 otherwise would be part of a fastest or shortest non-freeway route.

Perhaps we need to get a basic section on "pruning" added to the wiki as well. That may help clear up some confusion as to where road types actually do matter from a routing perspective.


I really wasn't suggesting downgrading it to a primary street, as I've always been of the opinion that in 99% of cases that any road with a state/US highways shield should always be classified as some sort of highway in Waze. I was just pointing out that there are instances where a US highway could have a fairly low FC.
Image
Mississippi State Manager
Memphis, TN Area Manager

Mississippi Wiki Pagehttps://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Mississippi
bart99gt
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bart99gt » Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:06 pm

pumrum wrote:After driving 8+ hour trips a few times over the last couple weeks, I can say that the new FC implementation in Waze is AWESOME. On several occasions I have been routed off a congested interstate onto a nearby US Highway or other MH/mH and around some very gnarly traffic (accidents, construction, rubberneckers). These are routes that would previously not have been considered.

If I could be granted one wish, it would be that everyone prioritizes getting the US Highway system upgraded to at MH or FWY (as appropriate). Spending most of my time in the New England area I really took it for granted, but driving more of the southeast and midwest I have come to realize how useful it is.


And I'm following up several months later and....

Yes it is AWESOME. The number of URs I get for Waze going out of the way when it could have taken another route that was shorter and faster, but previously had low or no classification have almost disappeared. When I drive through a relatively unedited area, one of the first things I do is check to see if FC has been done there, and if not, where I can find the maps and get it done. While it isn't a perfect system, it really has improved Waze for the better.
Image
Mississippi State Manager
Memphis, TN Area Manager

Mississippi Wiki Pagehttps://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Mississippi
bart99gt
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bart99gt » Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:02 pm

bz2012 wrote:Paragraph needing possible revision:
Emergency Vehicle and DOT Service Roads Service road.png[edit]
Emergency.jpg "Emergency and Authorized Vehicles Only" and DOT Service Roads are to be treated as Non-drivable roads. These are found primarily through the median of divided highways to connect opposite direction lanes. If mapped, they should not be connected to any drivable road, with properties set to road type Private Road, and lock the segment at as high a rank as possible, up to rank 5.

I believe the word I have shown in red above should be removed, or the rest of the sentence revised to remove the inherent contradiction (why bother to have it at all, if it is not connected to a drivable road and why bother to set it to private type?)


Agreed. I never draw in the "Emergency Vehicle Only" crossovers (paved or unpaved) on limited access roads. Since a typical driver can't legally use it under normal circumstances, there's little point to even have them there.
Image
Mississippi State Manager
Memphis, TN Area Manager

Mississippi Wiki Pagehttps://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Mississippi
bart99gt
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:02 am

Isn't your current mapping a modification on that table where US/SR are always Major/Minor unless FC says it should be higher?
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:09 pm

banished wrote:Out-of-area editor: "It's a primary street according to FC."
Local editor: "No, it's a minor highway. I know, because I drive it frequently."
Sorry, but in this case the state's DOT wins.

banished wrote:3. Florida doesn't even have a web-based FC map.
Yes it does. It's here and it's been in the Wiki for a while. However that site does not appear to work from IP addresses that GeoIP from out of state. Last time it worked for me was when I was there last December. F.I.T. may also have GIS resources usable with ArcGIS.

banished wrote:Hoping for Waze clarification why road type even matters given https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=212&t=48543.
Because road type is the fall-back for long distance routing. Rates only provides potentially better/more routes over Type based but only IF there's a statistically significant amount of rate information. That amount seems to closely correlate to the road rank that we currently see in the beta editor.
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:23 pm

qwaletee wrote:
CBenson wrote:Do we need to define at-grade connector? Specifically are roads at different grades required to meet the definition of "freeway" and "ramp." This comes up for roads like this. In this case there are no intersections that permit traffic to cross US-50. US-50 has an unbroken median. This combined with the fact that there are only limited access point to US-50 - that is the businesses do not have driveways that are directly served by US-50, makes me think this is a freeway. However, Duke St, Thomson Creek Rd, Castle Marina Rd, Cox Neck Rd, Dominion Rd, Chester Station Ln, Piney Creek Rd, S Piney Rd, Dundee Ave, Main St, Piney Narrows Rd etc all provide access to US-50 at junctions where there is no grade separation, because there is simply no access provided from one side of US-50 to other on these roads. There are BGSs at these exits on US-50 just like at the grade-separated interchanges.

So in the freeway definition it is stated that there should be "no at-grade intersections." I think that US-50 in this stretch meets the requirement for no at-grade intersections and the exit and entrance roads are not at-grade connectors and are thus properly ramps. However, given the current guidance and the proposed guidance if you interpret these access points "at-grade" then the US-50 would be a major highway and the exits and entrances should not be ramps.

I would state that if you can't cross the highway without either passing over or under the highway then all exits and entrances with acceleration and deceleration lanes along that highway should be considered "grade-separated."


Well, since the FC juggernaut seems to be rolling merrily along, what is its functional classification?
Freeway.
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:41 pm

Thortok2000 wrote:Essentially, my main problem with this system is that it's got two major flaws in my opinion. The first is that the routing system has a pretty high penalty for NOT using major highways and freeways when they are available. There are plenty of times where a 'shortcut' would more than likely be faster, but because it's not a US highway, Waze wants me to take the US highway as far as I possibly can before getting off it closer to my destination, assuming traffic is clear that day. Generally speaking, unless there's a traffic jam on every route that includes a major highway, then the only options I ever get are major highways, from the closest point to my starting position all the way to the closest point to my destination.
Except that doesn't actually happen in places typed to NFC+US/SR.
alts.jpg
alts.jpg (162.4 KiB) Viewed 423 times

Every route shown takes multiple miles of Primary, the third option additionally uses 1.9 miles of Street that parallels a Major Highway (Colorado Blvd).

Current routing basically does what you'd like it to if:
1. The map is very well edited. This is still rarely the case outside of major metros.
2. The map has actual viable routes typed appropriately.

NFC seems to fit the routing model very well, and is what your State's DOT thinks the viable routes are. This is not an accident as Waze's routing model in the absence of historical and live speed data is based on the classification system of the time. This still matches fairly well with the current classification system which is a simplified version of the older one.
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:01 pm

Because it's traffic dependent, you know like it's supposed to be? Additionally, that outside ring from I-25 to US-36 on the east side is all Toll. Without a LM option to disable tolls, you won't get a fastest route that doesn't use it because no one actually uses those toll roads except to go to the airport (iow they're empty about 80% of the time).

Thortok2000 wrote:It still isn't perfect in my opinion because of the heavy penalties for going from a higher type to a lower type.
No such thing exists except for transiting Priv/PLot/ToD Restriction to a different type.
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro

Postby bgodette » Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:25 pm

daknife wrote:Yep, I've looked at the FC map. As I've said I see the idea behind the FC maps, but don't really see the need to change thousands of miles of roads across multiple states. IF and only if, Minor does still get the same long range routing benefit that it used to. If that has in fact changed then I stand corrected and will start tasking my AM's to start reclassifying (Yay edit counts climb!)
The only thing that's changed with how routing has worked since ~2009 is Private/PLot/ToD.
ImageImage
bgodette
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 395 times

PreviousNext

Return to Wiki Updates and Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users