herrchin wrote:...hopefully that helps support the importance of directing editors to the State standards and not defaulting to "unpaved == Dirt Road".
I agree, and indeed my primary goal was to drive that point further home.
I feel strongly that drivers who check "Dirt roads - Don't allow" in the app do so not because of a literal aversion to driving on soil
in absolute terms, but simply because they are willing to sacrifice travel time for a smoother and/or less challenging ride
in locally relative terms.
This relative interpretation does not seem far-fetched. My experience is that we already edit according to this interpretation throughout the US.
If anything, the current Road Types (USA) article is being somewhat arbitrary by suggesting that drivers who check "Dirt roads - Don't allow" are indicating a specific desire to avoid unpaved roads. That suggestion is neither literal (because "dirt" is not identical with "unpaved") nor relative (because "unpaved" is not identical with "poor quality by local standards"). Where did the idea that "dirt" = "unpaved" come from, anyway?
Ideally, I believe, this section would play down associations with any particular surface
type and instead emphasize relative surface
quality. It would explicitly leave the door open for poor roads of any surface (even paved roads) to be classed as Dirt Road / 4X4 Trail, as well as good roads of any surface (even dirt roads) to be classed as Street or above.
That's it. The States can take it from there.