sketch wrote:Business, City, and Loop routes should have the minimum type one type lower than their parents.
So my assumption is that the note about business loops meeting freeway criteria then is going to go away?
Moderator: USA Champs
sketch wrote:Business, City, and Loop routes should have the minimum type one type lower than their parents.
Fredo-p wrote:That being said, I think it would be a good idea to include in the US road types wiki page that even though a nation wide standard of practice for FC implementation is the route we want to go, every state has a different way on how they implement the FC's. An addition to the wiki would be a link of sometype to the location on how each state classifies its roadways and how it translates that into Waze. The links could direct editors to a specific forum, state DOT page, or social media site that editors are using as a central place of contact and discussion on local editing.
DwarfLord wrote:This suggestion is incorporated in the above proposal. However, it would appear to remove some support for those regions that currently mark certain unpaved roads as Street type or higher. Those regions regularly use Dirt Road / 4X4 Trail for roads of poorer quality than unpaved alternatives.
proposal wrote:The Dirt Road / 4X4 Trail type has the unique property that Waze users may ask not to be routed over it. Users may ask to avoid it for all through routing with the settings option "Dirt roads - Don't allow", or to avoid it for through routing longer than 300 m (984 ft) with the option "Dirt roads - Avoid long ones".
Because of this property, this type typically represents supplementary roads that some fraction of local drivers habitually avoid due to surface quality. In dense regions, this generally means unpaved (dirt, gravel, crushed rock) roads, or roads in uncommonly poor condition by local standards. Elsewhere, ("however" removed here) improved unpaved roads (and possibly certain dirt roads) are essential routes and may be set to other types as if they were paved.
Check your state page for details on whether your state follows unique guidelines for dirt roads, or contact your regional coordinator for further guidance.
DwarfLord wrote:I don't think I've heard the term "supplementary road" (offered in place of "side road")...I could find very little use of it in a brief web search. The only clear example I did find was from Missouri. Perhaps it is a regional term? Is there a more general US term for less important or side roads that would do? If not, no worries, the meaning of "supplementary road" is I think clear enough and I'm OK keeping it.
Fredo-p wrote:Officially, that would be Local Road. A road with the lowest volume of traffic and lowest speed limit.
proposal wrote:The Dirt Road / 4X4 Trail type has the unique property that Waze users may ask not to be routed over it. Users may ask to avoid it for all through routing with the settings option "Dirt roads - Don't allow", or to avoid it for through routing longer than 300 m (984 ft) with the option "Dirt roads - Avoid long ones".
Because of this property, this type typically represents side roads that some fraction of local drivers habitually avoid due to surface quality. In dense regions, this generally means unpaved (dirt, gravel, crushed rock) roads, or roads in uncommonly poor condition by local standards. In other areas, roads with unpaved surfaces may be essential routes and thus necessarily set to other types such as "Street", "Primary Street", or even higher, as if they were paved.
Check your state page for details on whether your state follows unique guidelines for dirt roads, or contact your regional coordinator for further guidance.
qwaletee wrote:The term is "crushed stone" not "crushed rock."
Fredo-p wrote:I've never heard of macadam until this thread.
Users browsing this forum: JimboBaggins1966, Mapman44, Mythdraug, RichardPyne, steveinark