[Script] UROverview Plus v3.92 (20160924)

[AlanOfTheBerg]

Hmm, I wonder if we should do the same here in the US, and if so, should we just adopt the unfamiliar-to-us [ROADWORKS] tag, or ask for a US-specific one.

The US already uses a convention for road construction.

[dbraughlr]

should we just adopt the unfamiliar-to-us [ROADWORKS]

I think that would be okay if there was a button labeled "Construction Alert" on the Live Map problem report to insert the tag.

[sketch]

Hmm, I wonder if we should do the same here in the US, and if so, should we just adopt the unfamiliar-to-us [ROADWORKS] tag, or ask for a US-specific one.

The US already uses a convention for road construction.

Yes, for naming the roads themselves. We do not have a convention for calling attention to them in the editor via a UR.

[yaacobyy]

It would be great if there was a filter that filters out URs with text, or those without text (inserted by the originator).
Also it would be nice to have a filter for those URs not posted by me (I would see only my URs).

[Twister-UK]

3.10 includes the ability to filter URs based on whether or not they have any descriptive text included by the reporter, as requested by yaacobyy. It also now provides an appropriate update link based on the browser being used (i.e. Chrome users now get pointed to the Chrome Web Store, everyone else gets pointed to Greasyfork, and no-one gets pointed to userscripts.org...)

Firefox+Greasemonkey version: https://greasyfork.org/scripts/1952-uroverview-plus-uro
Chrome Web Store version: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... mjcdghdphi

[Twister-UK]

It would be great if there was a filter that filters out URs with text, or those without text (inserted by the originator).
Also it would be nice to have a filter for those URs not posted by me (I would see only my URs).

For your first request, see V3.10 Unfortunately, since Waze doesn't provide any user identification data with URs, there's no way to provide an automatic way to fulfil your second request. The way I and some other editors get around this is to ensure that any URs we post ourselves include our usernames in the description text (via the use of keyboard shortcuts on our phones where available), allowing us to filter them by keyword. It's not an ideal solution, but it's the only one we've got...

[yaacobyy]

Thanks for the 2 replies.

[bz2012]

The problem SEEMS to have gone away on its own! Very strange.

URO+ seems to break WME today.
1) very slow loading of roads
2) left info bar with no data after roads finish loading.
(name etc. 'disappear' after roads finish loading)

Disabling URO+ speeds up loading and the info on the bar does not go away.

Removed and reinstalled; no joy.
Tried disabling ALL other extensions except URO+; no joy.

The info bar did get populated AFTER I selected a road segment.

[Twister-UK]

3.11.1 now stores the server (row, usa or il) associated with each camera added to the CWL - this allows URO+ to ignore cameras which aren't on the current server, instead of erroneously marking them as deleted. This also significantly reduces the time taken to start an editing session on a server if the CWL contains lots of cameras associated with a different server.

Also for CWL afficionados, the generic alert message which appeared whenever a watched camera was tagged as having been changed or deleted has now been replaced with something ever so slightly more informative...

Finally, nestling just below the "Undo last hide/Undo all hides" buttons on the URO+ sidebar, you'll now find the names of the area managers (if any) looking after the location under the current mouse pointer position.


Firefox+Greasemonkey version: https://greasyfork.org/scripts/1952-uroverview-plus-uro
Chrome Web Store version: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... mjcdghdphi

[SuperDave1426]

I just updated to the latest version in the Chrome store, and now it no longer shows up on my map screen (and there's no named layer for it showing for me to turn on, either)....

Any ideas?