Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

The place to get information and ask questions about everything to do with properly and successfully editing the Waze Map.

Use this forum for all general editing questions, and the sub-forums for specific types of Waze Map Editor features.

Moderators: Unholy, Unholy

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby Kraz31 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 8:58 pm

tlcarpenter69 wrote:And even better, the move was rejected by an editor in India because...you guessed it: "has wrong information".
Story of every GMM edit I've ever made. I've never gotten a reply when I've tried to dispute the rejection either.
Image
I don't get lost, I accidentally find new places.
Kraz31
Map Editor - level 3
Map Editor - level 3
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 11:12 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby Machete808 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:49 am

Maybe no credit could be assigned for closing a report, until you're 2+ ?
Aloha,
Vicki
Hawaii State Manager
Area manager, Los Angeles

iPhone5c, iOS 8.0.2
Image Image

Helpful links:
How to handle parking lots
Waze help/support
Machete808
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 12:36 am
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby orbitc » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:52 pm

Regional Coordinator for Northeast (DE, NJ, NY, PA) & New England (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT)
CM: U.S.A. & T.C.
• ßeta Tester
• iOS: Always the latest Beta

Image
WME | Mentoring | AM | USA
orbitc
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 4921
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:51 pm
Location: NJ / NY, USA
Has thanked: 1357 times
Been thanked: 2777 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby orbitc » Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:03 am

Fredo-p wrote:Then would it be possible to set up UR closures by L1 editors the same way Google Map Maker has theirs?
If a map edit on Map Maker is of importance, then the edit isn't fully approved. A message is given that reads "This edit will need to be verified by other editors".

In the case of Waze, when an L1 editor closes a UR, it isn't really closed. It's given a special icon or highlight that indicates a higher ranking editor must approve the closeout of the UR for it to be fully accepted.

Maybe, instead of having the option to save a UR as solved or not identified, an L1's option would be to select solved or not identified and the save button would read verify/approve. This would alert higher level editors that an L1 is requesting approval for their UR/MP edit.

I wish it was that simple. I like the idea but it's not practical. We have many URs and not enough editors to fix them. I've seen URs that are as old as 30+ days. Implementing that idea might make UR solving process even slower unfortunately.
Regional Coordinator for Northeast (DE, NJ, NY, PA) & New England (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT)
CM: U.S.A. & T.C.
• ßeta Tester
• iOS: Always the latest Beta

Image
WME | Mentoring | AM | USA
orbitc
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 4921
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:51 pm
Location: NJ / NY, USA
Has thanked: 1357 times
Been thanked: 2777 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby orbitc » Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:38 am

Taco909 wrote:
Helgramite wrote:My Master of the Obvious moment for Friday ... It would be easier to just NOT display URs to Level 1s. You cant close what you cannot see. Have the L2 upgrade require an AM check of your edits.

They need the exposure and ability to work them, limited as their abilities may be.
They also need the exposure to how higher level editors are handling them WRT canned messages, back and forth, ultimate resolution, etc...

In addition to that, we have formal mentoring program where we help editors editing, solving URs and other map and community topic. Not to mention the accelerated promotions.
Regional Coordinator for Northeast (DE, NJ, NY, PA) & New England (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT)
CM: U.S.A. & T.C.
• ßeta Tester
• iOS: Always the latest Beta

Image
WME | Mentoring | AM | USA
orbitc
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 4921
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:51 pm
Location: NJ / NY, USA
Has thanked: 1357 times
Been thanked: 2777 times

Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby ottonomy » Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:31 am

At the very least, I'd like to see a restriction on L1s closing URs with comments on them by other editors, and perhaps a requirement that, on URs without conversations, first a comment must be left by the L1 editor, and then a delay of x days must elapse before the UR can be closed by that L1 editor.
Area Manager - Southern California / Country Manager - United States
ottonomy
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:31 am
Location: Los Angeles CA
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby Poncewattle » Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:48 pm

Taco909 wrote:One of the most creative excuses for leaving red roads I've seen was from an L1 who put 2 and 2 together on the red roads and came up with "5"... The road is a different color on the map + The error in the top corner says "Unconfirmed" = "That is a flag for a higher level editor to review and approve the edit" :lol:


Don't laugh. That was my impression of what it was on my first day editing. The second day I went over the wiki again and saw the relevant page and went back and fixed my red PLR (where I work). But hey, I at least did THAT right after reading not to draw ever parking lot road in!

(Unfortunately, it took me a few more days to learn I had to submit an unlock request to get that PLR tied into a rank 3 road.... Sigh....)
Poncewattle
Area Manager: Luray, VA : Bronx, NY
Contributor to: Northern Delaware
Residences: Luray, VA / Newark, DE
ImageImageImage
AFK until May 17th
Poncewattle
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:00 am
Location: Virginia/Delaware, USA
Has thanked: 200 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby qwaletee » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:45 pm

That's more complicated than necessary. Once they are making code changes, they can do what they want. Making an unintuitive, hard to use UI is not really the solution.
NYC Metro | Mentor | USA Country Manager | Responding to Map Issues
qwaletee
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:42 am
Location: NYC Metro
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 627 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby qwaletee » Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:53 pm

And thus was Waze converted wholesale to Google Map Maker.

GMM goes to far toward the closed system of editing and approvals. Waze goes to far toward openness. There is no way to make everything perfect. I believe Waze is still concentrating on features visible to the client, so we're probably not going to see too much change in this arena.
NYC Metro | Mentor | USA Country Manager | Responding to Map Issues
qwaletee
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:42 am
Location: NYC Metro
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 627 times

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Postby qwaletee » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:14 pm

Take it easy, Taco. It isn't world-ending. If we clamped down hard and required editors to have a real learning curve before they could affect ANYTHINg well, then Waze might as well be owne... wait. Never mind.
NYC Metro | Mentor | USA Country Manager | Responding to Map Issues
qwaletee
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:42 am
Location: NYC Metro
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 627 times

PreviousNext

Return to Waze Map Editor

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot]