Highways and interstates: city name necessary?
In general, many highways and interstates have no addresses associated with them. Yes, sometimes smaller highways do, but for the larger ones which simply pass through urban boundaries, they often are major conduits from location to location without any need to have a city tied to the segments.
Is there a reason why, besides just because they are within an urban area, interstates and other non-address highways should have a city associated with them?
Is there a reason why, besides just because they are within an urban area, interstates and other non-address highways should have a city associated with them?
Re: Highways and interstates: city name necessary?