Post Reply
Forum rules
The place to ask for help when editing in the UK.

Map Editing Guidelines . Join the UK Discord Server

Waze Going Roundabout to choose the Slower Route

Post by a2bpdq
Waze generally comes up with the best routes and it is certainly a very reliable and capable navigator, however, I noticed it often seems to fall down slightly when it comes to complex roundabouts and I have a feeling that Waze is failing here.

Here (Permalink) is an example.



This roundabout has recently been upgraded at the end of September 2017. A new direct road has been added for traffic on the A40 Westbound which allows vehicles to cut through the roundabout.

The problem is, anyone choosing the fastest route gets directed around the roundabout and not through the cut-through, which is wrong.

Meanwhile, anyone choosing the shortest route gets directed through the cut-through, which is correct.

I have responded to a couple of URs about this problem where Wazers have reported the issue.

I have tested the roundabout myself and sure enough, I was guided the long-way around the roundabout, every time.

I spent an hour observing traffic through the roundabout and noticed that the cut-through was faster every time and should have been the preferred route.

I have also run route tests with the App and Waze Map and consistently found that Waze gives the same slower route, going around the roundabout instead of straight across, any time of day or night.

Any ideas why Waze is giving the wrong route? Can we get Waze programmers to check it?

Edited 8:17pm 20th October 2017 - Picture of Map Added to provide a quick visual explanation
a2bpdq
Master Raider
Master Raider
Posts: 338
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 27 times

POSTER_ID:17505671

1

Send a message
Last edited by a2bpdq on Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post by a2bpdq
Thank you Chris (atrophicshiner). I do have comments turned on and I had already seen the comment on the map but thanks for the advice anyway.

I also agree that iainhouse should be consulted should any changes need to be made.

However, I am not suggesting changes to the map. The map seems fine. What's wrong is how Waze has navigated this roundabout incorrectly.

Bearing in mind this roundabout is not unique, Waze should be able to handle it better than this.

The idea that tweaks have to be put in to trick Waze into getting these junctions right makes it clear that something is wrong and the programmers need to take a look.

Thanks for adding the data. It shows that Waze thinks the longer route is 10/14s quicker, which might possibly have been true at the time but was certainly not true today at any time. Would you kindly let me know the same for today when I was there: 1pm to 2pm on Wednesday 18th October 2017. It would be interesting to match the data with what I saw.
a2bpdq
Master Raider
Master Raider
Posts: 338
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 27 times
Send a message

Post by a2bpdq
Thanks again Chris. That data shows that Waze believes the long way around the roundabout was 10s faster than the cut-through route at around 1pm to 2pm (the time I was there observing it).

What I saw yesterday (and experienced while driving it) was that traffic going around the roundabout was delayed longer than traffic using the cut-through.

The delay would be about 10-15s, though I didn't measure it precisely. I did observe it and kept a fairly good count of the seconds.

When I drove it, the traffic lights turned green and I made my way around the long way. A van which started to enter the cut-through, at the same time as I entered the roundabout, went straight through the next traffic lights. Meanwhile I went around and waited at other traffic lights and saw the van had crossed in front and was speeding off into the distance. The same happened the next time with another vehicle (Mercedes Estate).

Also, I watched the junction for an hour and every single time (each cycle of traffic lights) the traffic on the cut-through went through faster than the traffic going around the roundabout. There were no exceptions. Waze definitely had the data the wrong way around.

Basically. Waze believes the opposite of the facts on the ground.

As you say, the data does account for Waze giving the wrong route.

So the data is wrong and continues to stay wrong because:
  • Waze incorrectly assigns the fast times of the cut-through route to the roundabout route (that it recommended to Fastest-Route-Wazers and assumed they had followed).
  • The slower times of the Shortest-Route-Wazers are assigned correctly to the cut-through (but this provides an unfair bias).
The slow times are always linked to the cut-through and the fast times are always incorrectly linked to the roundabout. Waze is fooled every time.

In reality, hardly anyone would be actually going around the roundabout, they will all use the cut-through, so there will be no slow speeds to make Waze see things any differently. Left like this it's never going to change. Wazers will forever be given the wrong route here.

The GPS tracks can be fairly accurate and certainly can be accurate enough to determine a change of route. I proved that myself by driving through the cut-through and Waze rerouted me while I was in the middle of the cut-through. However, I do admit that the GPS tracks can be way off too. Probably GPS alone cannot be used to accurately monitor the correct track where roads are in close proximity.

I am sure you are correct that Waze is being misled because the roads are so close together and Waze can't differentiate. What I have said above is just reiterating your point by giving an example which I have verified to know with certainty that Waze is wrong on this.

What I am suggesting is that Waze should be able to handle this situation better. I am sure the programmers would be able to do something to overcome this situation where Waze is consistently wrong.

This example is a good one to review as it is so obvious that Waze is failing.

Some ideas of how it could be put right by programming:
  • Use of accelerometers (available on many smart phones) to detect changes in direction and therefore more accurately determine the route taken
  • Provide editing tools which allow map editors to reset or influence the data
  • Provide an app function to record "better route through junction" (a bit like recording closures where Wazers are given arrows on the map and we tap the one that we actually took and this causes Waze to temporarily use the other turn, if doing so provides a valid alternative route).
  • Slow route property (editors add a delay to a group of joined segments in order to reflect reality such that routes utilizing all of those segments in the same order get a time penalty (in this case it would be 15s))
This problem seems to affect many of the complex roundabouts in the UK and is likely to affect similar junctions around the world. Getting this right would make Waze even better and even more dependable.
a2bpdq
Master Raider
Master Raider
Posts: 338
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 27 times
Send a message

Post by a2bpdq
This problem continues to occur and there are a couple more URs about it. Very clearly Waze is failing to get navigation through this roundabout right most of the time.

On checking the names of the roads I see that alternate names have not been used, contrary to Detour Prevention Mechanisms - Big Detours.

I will put in a request for the alternate names to be added, then continue to monitor the routes to see if it makes any difference.
a2bpdq
Master Raider
Master Raider
Posts: 338
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 27 times
Send a message

Post by atrophicshiner
The simple answer is that Waze believes that the roundabout is faster based on average speed data. At the times of the reports 13:30 & 20:30 on Sunday, Route 1 = the roundabout, Route 2 = the cut-through

Sunday 13:30
sun2030.png
(8.72 KiB) Downloaded 290 times
Sunday 20:30
sun1330.png
(9.24 KiB) Downloaded 301 times
This is usually caused by the same problem as having the external bypass lanes, Waze can't always correctly associate the speed data with the cut-through lane as it is so close to the roundabout. There is a Map Comment covering this roundabout (you should always work with these turned on in the layer menu).

Iainhouse has already added some tricks to encourage Waze to use the cut-through. Any alteration / tweaking should definitely be done with his consultation ;)
atrophicshiner
Waze Local Champs
Waze Local Champs
Posts: 6000
Answers: 8
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2329 times
Send a message
- Chris - (Catching up with the Ia{i}ns one Chris at a time)

https://cottagepi.uk/proud-wazer.gifhttps://cottagepi.uk/pirate.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/Beta_app.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/tolls.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/Iain.png
UK Local Champ would you believe
AM the Middle bit of England
Usability | Simplicity | Retention

Post by atrophicshiner
I'd say it is more the limitation of the technology in mobile devices. Waze relies on GPS to know where you are, with a +/- accuracy and roads that run close together there is a limit to what can be done.

I'm using Route Speeds script to show the hidden speed data. For a typical Wednesday between 13:00 & 14:00, roundabout = 03:52, cut-through = 04:02. This does not account for realtime speed data that Waze will also use.
atrophicshiner
Waze Local Champs
Waze Local Champs
Posts: 6000
Answers: 8
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2329 times
Send a message
- Chris - (Catching up with the Ia{i}ns one Chris at a time)

https://cottagepi.uk/proud-wazer.gifhttps://cottagepi.uk/pirate.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/Beta_app.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/tolls.pnghttps://cottagepi.uk/Iain.png
UK Local Champ would you believe
AM the Middle bit of England
Usability | Simplicity | Retention