I don’t quite get the phrase “In one mile, get ready to turn right”. Shouldn’t I be getting ready to turn right long before then? It seems the actual turn is one mile from the time I hear this statement. “Get ready to turn right in one mile”, or “In one mile, turn right”, or “In one mile you will turn right”, etc. might better sooth the grammarian. Anyone else find this construct just a little odd?
Well, here in India, we get the first voice command at 800 metres, which is good distance to switch lanes. Unless you are driving a Super car!
:shock:
Sent from my MB526 using Tapatalk 2
The instruction means that you should get ready now, because a turn is coming up in one mile. But if you don’t first tell the driver how far ahead the next maneuver will be, there is a moment of uncertainty & anxiety that it might be coming much sooner. We don’t want people panic-braking on the highway when they hear “Get ready to turn right…”, only to be followed by, “…in one mile.”
In a moving vehicle, the distance (or time) to the next maneuver must come first.
Once again, what’s the problem with “in one mile, turn right?”
This is the one single thing about the client app that I wish Waze would change! My wife comments on the 'in one mile, get ready to turn right ’ everytime we go somewhere. She hates it, its the only reason she refuses to use Waze, and has actually asked me to stop using it when she is in the car.
However, if you use the ‘minimal’ voice instruction instead of ‘Full’ it sounds a LOT better.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Nothing, but that’s not what mine says. I’ll try the minimal voice instruction setting as mentioned.
Oh, it’s not what mine says either. I just don’t see why we need that “get ready to” that people complain about.
Yes, the grammar could be cleaned up a bit in English, but I would rather have the notice that I need to prepare to make a turn a mile in advance than none at all.
I have never been extremely upset about the wording, but I have taken notice to this as well many times before and always wondered about the “get ready” part too as it sounds silly the way it is wording because in one mile I would be in the process of completing my turn lol
I’m with Harling on this, I think the wording is grammatically correct for the purpose, “Hey driver dude (or dudette) in about one mile, get ready to turn right.”
At this point it’s a warning not an instruction, and thus the warning should advise you to get ready.
Thus it presents the needed data: “Distance”; “Be prepared”; “To turn right”. At one mile out, even at 75 mph one mile is more than adequate time to change lanes or otherwise prepare for and upcoming turn, then when at the point of the turn the driver is mentally ready for the “Turn Right” instruction (not to mention at least one in between prompting.)
I still think, in order to make it sound like a “prepare” statement, say, “be ready” instead.
Whether this is intentional is anyone’s guess, but IMO the “get ready” serves as a second layer of defense against panic braking & turning. If there is a long delay between the distance announcement (e.g., “in one mile…”) and the turn direction (e.g., “…turn left”), or the driver does not hear the distance announcement for some reason, the “…turn left” instruction sounds immediate. Prefacing it with “get ready to…” clarifies that the maneuver is not immediate.
As has been suggested before, “In one mile, be ready to turn right” serves all the same functions.
“Be prepared to turn right in one mile”
Since it doesn’t start out with the distance, you won’t know if it is it one mile, a quarter mile, 0.1 mile etc. until the end of the instruction (by which time you might fly past the turn, if you don’t hit the brakes as a precaution).
I’m sure you would slow down on approaching the location! 
The prompt is telling you, indirectly to slow down as well…
There a distance counter on the screen as well. So if you can grab a glance you’ll have a good idea, when to start turning, as you would have slowed down, sufficiently by then.
MB526 - > Tapatalk 2
On the highway, “In one mile…” means I have about a minute before my next maneuver. If I’m in the inside lane, I need to start heading to the outside. I do not need to slow down yet, and people behind me will be annoyed if I do.
“In a quarter mile…” means my next maneuver takes place about 15 seconds after the start of the announcement–and perhaps half that by the time the announcement is completed. If I’m not already in the correct lane, I need to get over now or I’m going to miss my turn, and it may already be too late to start slowing down, depending on the ramp.
By telling the driver that a turn is coming up, but not mentioning which of the above two scenarios applies until the very end of the announcement–by which point the remaining distance/time may have decreased considerably–there is a period of ambiguity during which the driver doesn’t know if he has a leisurely minute in which to prepare, or is about to miss his turn entirely.
Having to read the remaining distance indicator, in order to decide whether you need to slow down immediately and/or make a mad dash for the outside lane, is not acceptable. The purpose of audible directions is to reduce your dependence on the screen, so you can keep your eyes on the road and drive more safely. Since spoken instructions are one-dimensional (i.e., they can only impart information in the order in which it is presented), that ordering is critical.
So, how would you have it sound?
MB526 - > Tapatalk 2
In my opinion, the purpose of audible directions is to supplement what I know about the route I am travelling. I frequently use Waze to guide me through areas where I have never before driven. Because of this, I use my time on the road wisely. In addition to my mirrors and (less frequently) my speedometer, I also look at my phone’s display to check how far I am from my next maneuver. I match that against my odometer. The fraction of a second it takes me to add this information to my drive is inconsequential.
I think if you are relying fully on the audible instructions, especially at highway speeds, I feel you are using the tool incorrectly.
Which is why, “in one mile, be ready to turn right” is, IMO, still the best compromise between intent and grammar.
I still find the queuing of instructions for closely spaced junctions wrong. You’ll get “in 800 metres get ready to turn left and then turn right”… why would I want to confuse everyone by getting ready for a left turn and then actually turn right? In such cases the get ready has to go.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2