Hi all,
The 210 freeway east of the State Route 57 interchange is a State Route, not an Interstate Highway as is the case west of State Route 57, however both highways are numbered 210. I have renamed the segments beginning at the interchange and working eastward, but beginning in Claremont, CA the segments are locked.
https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=4&lat=34.12035&lon=-117.75024&layers=BFTFFTTTFTTFTTTTFTTTTFT
PLEASE do not change I-210 to State Route
please see http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/signtech/calnexus/pdf/210.pdf
When I look things up, you will get that it is a state route and in other places it is interstate, so currently please leave it as interstate.
Thanks
Except that it is signed as CA-210 east of CA-57 and thus naming it as I-210 produces incorrect driving directions for entering the highway from local streets.
In addition, FHWA (the Federal Highway Administration, part of the US Department of Transportation, the administering authority for Interstate highways) denies I-210 existing in the San Bernadino metro area as per http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/routefinder/table4.htm and states that I-210 in California is 48.72 miles long at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/routefinder/table3.htm, which corresponds to the distance between Sylmar, CA and San Dimas, CA along I-210.
I would suggest that the highway be renamed as State Rte 210 east of State Rte 57 with alternate names added for the Interstate designator if desired.
With the two tables you listed I don’t see a date for the data but a summary date of 2002.
But I have done more searching and based on the dates on the maps… I agree with you…
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_map/14v12.pdf, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_map/14v13.pdf which has a date of 8/5/11
I am using this site to look at road classification for California… http://dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/index.php