At this segment, the turn restriction for northbound traffic continuing northbound should be fixed.
Also, IMHO, all of these segments should be of “Ramp” type, rather than Major Highway, as they are in fact a ramp connecting I-495 S to I-95 S.
At this segment, the turn restriction for northbound traffic continuing northbound should be fixed.
Also, IMHO, all of these segments should be of “Ramp” type, rather than Major Highway, as they are in fact a ramp connecting I-495 S to I-95 S.
I sent a PM to Mike-1323 with a link to this thread. He did most of the latest work on that area.
I fixed the turn restriction.
I’m thinking about the ramp issue. The “exit” is a multi-laned, full speed connector from one freeway to another with exits off of it. I know that in other areas the freeway to freeway connector roads are freeway type and in some areas they are ramp type. If those segments are made ramp type then for consistency these segments should be ramp as well.
I’m going to post in the editing forum to get an opinion of the community as a whole.
Fair enough. I drove through there today and my impression was that the voice guidance was confusing; it looks like an exit as you are approaching it, but the TTS says “stay to the right” instead of “exit right.”
On a related topic, the revised ramp “bowtie” at SR-644 worked in part; Waze did correctly guide me from the Outer Loop to Exit 169A for Franconia Rd. The one fly in the ointment is that after I merged onto the C/D road, there was no “stay to the left” instruction for the split, probably because there is now only one legal way that traffic entering from the side ramps can go at that point. I don’t see any way to fix that issue without re-creating the potentially incorrect routing off the Beltway; but maybe I’ve overlooked something?