[Page Update] Private Installations

As I was reading through the Private Installations article, I found the section below under “B. Preventing Other Editors from Making Mistakes” to be outdated.

I’d recommend this language to use map comments rather than a UR for blocked roads at the installation boundary.

Related to that, with the table of contents on the article giving section numbers to 8.1-8.4, it seems unnecessary to label those sections as A, B, C, and D. Other similar areas aren’t labeled as such. Should those letters be removed?

Looks like a good update to bring the guidance in line with what’s now available to us in the editor.

I don’t think it would hurt anything to leave the labels, but if it cleans it up and brings this page into alignment with the majority of others, I can support removal.

Really I would prefer slightly different wording but “by in” doesn’t work.

Good catch. By is a definitely a typo.

I wanted to check back in to see if there’s any other feedback before making the change. I’ll give it another couple of days and if no one objects, I’ll make the change with turbomkt’s correction.