[Script] WME Place Harmonizer v1.2

[dspille]

@steelpanz

Really enjoying this tool as it continues to evolve for much better and more accurate data entry. I was curious about another possible feature - this one involving lobby and pharmacy hours (hours that belong in the description). The logic currently allows for a message notification to pop up when a pharmacy is identified to add such related hours. Is there any chance that the API for entering and standardizing hours could be invoked and inserted into the Description box en lieu of that message?

Great idea! I think this would be very useful.

[juliansean]

@steelpanz

Really enjoying this tool as it continues to evolve for much better and more accurate data entry. I was curious about another possible feature - this one involving lobby and pharmacy hours (hours that belong in the description). The logic currently allows for a message notification to pop up when a pharmacy is identified to add such related hours. Is there any chance that the API for entering and standardizing hours could be invoked and inserted into the Description box en lieu of that message?

Great suggestion!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RussPA]

I get this message on almost all parking lots, regardless of the # of parking spots set: “# of Parking Spaces is set to 1-10. If appropriate, select another option:” The message goes away if I change the cost to any other setting from whatever it was (combination doesn’t matter).

[MapOMatic]

Thanks Russ. I’ve logged that issue and will check it out soon.

[SuperDave1426]

I’ve observed something odd with Rest Areas. I’ve run into ones that PH is flagging red. When I select it, there’s a question at the top saying “Is this a rest area?” with a “yes” checkbox and a whitelisting marker. I can click on either “Yes” or try to whitelist it, but nothing happens. Clicking on WL doesn’t make the WL button go away, and “Yes” doesn’t seem to do anything either. Either way, it remains there, continuing to flag a rest area (which does have the correct category set) as red.

Any ideas what’s causing this?

[jm6087]

@SuperDave1426

I’ve observed something odd with Rest Areas. I’ve run into ones that PH is flagging red. When I select it, there’s a question at the top saying “Is this a rest area?” with a “yes” checkbox and a whitelisting marker. I can click on either “Yes” or try to whitelist it, but nothing happens. Clicking on WL doesn’t make the WL button go away, and “Yes” doesn’t seem to do anything either. Either way, it remains there, continuing to flag a rest area (which does have the correct category set) as red.

Any ideas what’s causing this?

I believe that Map-O-Matic has this logged to work on already.

[SuperDave1426]

Ah, ok. Thanks for the info.

[Ringmaster042]

It seems that WME no longer has a blank entry at the top of the gas station brand list.

[vince1612]

@Ringmaster042

It seems that WME no longer has a blank entry at the top of the gas station brand list.

This was reported to staff

[GuidedTour]

While editing a Casey’s gas station, I ran WMEPH and found that it duplicated the gas station brand list. It created another list directly on top of the one that was already there. With the help of others, I found that when I disable WMEPH the second list goes away. Thanks for the awesome work you guys do!

[jkl5]

[emoji1303][emoji3]great work . Keep doing amazing things

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ajcadoo]

@dspille

My apologies if this has already been discussed, but since HNs are not required for PLAs when a parking lot name is present, would it be possible/advisable not to flag for a missing HN? Also, since a website and phone number are generally not required for PLAs unless there is a third party operator, would it be a good idea not to flag the missing website and phone if there is no operator specified?

Do we have a consensus on this point? It is a very strong point that should be addressed.

[jm6087]

@ajcadoo

@dspille

My apologies if this has already been discussed, but since HNs are not required for PLAs when a parking lot name is present, would it be possible/advisable not to flag for a missing HN? Also, since a website and phone number are generally not required for PLAs unless there is a third party operator, would it be a good idea not to flag the missing website and phone if there is no operator specified?

Do we have a consensus on this point? It is a very strong point that should be addressed.

The website and phone number already do not flag when missing. I am not sure where we stand on the HN yet.

[juliansean]

It would be a two step check then. If name present HN not needed. We would still want it flagged with no name and no HN.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ajcadoo]

@juliansean

It would be a two step check then. If name present HN not needed. We would still want it flagged with no name and no HN.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed. I think this makes the most sense.

[SpencerFG]

Has anyone noticed that WMEPH has stopped working in Firefox? I upgraded to 1.3.14 but it still doesn’t work. It does work on Chrome.

Thanks.

[ehcool68]

I’ve noticed a lot of businesses have switched their websites over to using secure https:// by default rather than http:// which generally leads to the warning “Existing URL doesn’t match the suggested PNH URL.”

What is the process for us to get this fed back into WMEPH? Use the “report script error” button (this isn’t what I think of as a bug in the script) ? Or is there a more preferred approach?

Thanks!

Eric

[adamwillis]

Has this script been abandoned? The latest update to the harmonizer is updating to v1.3.14 and the UserScript Update URL changed to ‘undefined’.

The update url has changed from:
‘https://greasyfork.org/scripts/28690-wme-place-harmonizer/code/WME%20Place%20Harmonizer.user.js’ to: ‘undefined’

[juliansean]

It has not been abandoned. I’ll bring it up to the writers.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SpencerFG]

@SpencerFG

Has anyone noticed that WMEPH has stopped working in Firefox? I upgraded to 1.3.14 but it still doesn’t work. It does work on Chrome.

Thanks.

So here I am talking to myself but I wanted to say that 1.3.14 is now working in FF. I don’t believe I did anything.