This appears to be a case where the USPS database the script is polling has bad data. The attached screenshot shows the data returned from the routes lookup database, and I’ve highlighted the fields that the script uses to display city name and zip – they are separate fields from the facility name, but as you stated are not USPS’s recommended city name for that zip code.
In order to return that recommended city name, the script would need to do a second lookup to the “cities by zip code” search from USPS. This was previously discussed on Discord as a possibility, but not a likely one as the author of this script is currently on a break from scripting. Although I do believe this is the first real-life example I’ve seen where the recommended city was not being returned by the routes lookup – it was previously theorized it was possible to have such a discrepancy, but all previous examples were ones where the returned city name matched the recommended, but locals used the alt name.
That said, I do have an outstanding pull request for this script that adds the “recommended city name lookup” link to the returned routes at the top left of WME that makes it much easier to confirm the recommended and alt city names. I’ll see if I can get someone from WazeDev to review that at some point this week since it would benefit your use case.
There is a workaround for this. As the image below shows, the ZIP code appears in two places on the screen – you’re looking at the one in the upper left. The one in the top center is a link; click on it, and you get the blue rectangle that shows you which city name is “recommended” by the USPS for that ZIP code.
Sorry about that. I screwed up the version # a few months ago (used 2021.08.01 instead of 2021.01.08) so updates haven’t been pushing automatically for a lot of people. I just now returned the version # to the wrong format so it should update now.
If anyone needs to make any code fixes, just keep incrementing the last digit (don’t update the date portion) until we’re past August 1. Then we can get back to using the correct dated versions.