Australian Place Style Guide

Since we don’t really have any guidelines on how to create, manage and maintain Places for Australia, I’ve decided to create a little write up of basic considerations when creating/editing Places.

All segments and Places need to comply with the Waze editing philosophy from Wazeopedia, only add places that are relevant to Waze’s function as a navigation app - that is, possible destinations, or features that aid orientation. Other types of places aren’t in line with the Waze map editing goal of SIMPLICITY.

If you decide you want to create a Place in the editor, the best way to ensure it doesn’t need constant maintenance, is to do it right the first time. Fill in all the information you possibly can, don’t just add Places to the map because it’s there.

At a bare minimum, your created Place needs to have:

  • Title/Name
  • Relevant Category

And a best effort for the following information: (be aware some fields may not need filling in, depending on the type of Place)

  • Address
  • Short, Accurate and Unbiased description
    By this I mean no opinions on a particular Place, stick to the facts or don’t add Places at all.
  • Entry point (this aids more in Area Place navigation to ensure the route goes to the correct street.
  • Appropriate Lock Level (more on this below).
  • Appropriate use of Area/Point Places
    Most Places should be a Point Place. The exceptions are water bodies, parks, relevant places that can be used at a glance to orient the driver, and Places that should be shown on the map (petrol stations). See When to use Area/Point
  • Website and/or Phone (if available)
    Do NOT use Facebook, even if it’s the company’s official Facebook page. You must use a website that belongs directly to the business owner, not any third party hosting site.
    Check that the website doesn’t prohibit linking without permission. Their Terms & Conditions page will usually include any restrictions. Australia Post, for example, requires a formal approval process.
  • Accurate Services (some checkboxes may not apply to a certain type of place)
  • Opening hours (if set, not variable)

A few extra notes:

  • Don’t stretch Area Places so that they intersect with road segments, they should come a little bit back from the road, as this avoids problems with editing geometry.
  • If possible, add an external provider. This not only assists with making sure the place is in the correct spot, it also allows us to link that place to the Google Result.

Locking
Lock levels need to take a few factors into consideration:

  • Complexity of Place, be it in geometry or data
  • Integrity of any linked data, external providers or petrol data.
  • Completion

At an absolute max for standard places lock level not under Vandalism or any special circumstances, the lock should be 3.

Examples:
Petrol station with all data filled out and complete, L3.
Petrol station with name and minimal info, L2.
Park in the suburbs, with no data, L1
Park with all relevant data added and nothing left to add, L2.
Sydney Harbour (complex geometrical shape, necessary for orientation on Waze map), L3.

If the above guidance does not cover your query, please refer to the Global Place guidance.


I am open to any suggestions on different wording or amendments to the guide as it stands. Thanks all!

I’ll update that when I get home from work tonight :slight_smile:

Does that mean if we don’t have all the minimum information we shouldn’t add the place at all? I often don’t know Services or opening hours. I also usually can’t think of anything to put in the description that isn’t obvious from the name or the category.

That’s partially why the lock level is lower when the Place is not complete. So editors can fill in the blanks. As a best practise though, if you’re adding a Place yourself, you should have been there to check this information. If it’s a PUR, it’s okay if it has a few things missing but a quick search on their website can usually clear some of that up.

Updated. If anyone else has any suggestions in what to put in here, that would be most welcome. (hopefully we can create a local wiki entry for this)

Oops! That was me trying to insert formatting and ended up pushing that lower. Thanks!

Done, I hope you don’t mind I copy pasted that, you put it better than I could word it.

I’ve amended it to something like you suggested, does it look good to you now?

Edited. Fair enough, I typed a lot of revisions on my phone, so that was likely an auto-correct error. In any case all points have been added/revised.

Over the next week or so I’ll gradually import this to Wazeopedia, unless anyone has any objections. It’ll look better with proper formatting that the forum doesn’t provide.

Should we alter the part in the Global Places Wiki where it says to “map to the edges of the property” and to draw “to the fenceline / curbline”? The part earlier on in this discussion which said “Don’t stretch Area Places so that they intersect with road segments, they should come a little bit back from the road, as this avoids problems with editing geometry.” covers this mostly. Are we applying this to ALL area places and if so, would it be useful to include a screenshot? The following is from the wiki which looks like how things are currently done elsewhere:

Would our version of the same image have the top and right hand edges of the area place matching the original, but have the left and bottom sides moved to the road segment instead?

The Global section should be altered by the Global Champs, in accordance with their own discussion. This is merely overriding instruction, as we prioritise instruction in order of Australia -> Global -> Other Countries.

Sorry, I worded it wrong. I was talking more about adapting what is it there and using it in our wiki by referring to how they word it.

Oh yes, the wording might be changed a little bit, for clarity, and will be under more relevant headers. I will be referring to how they did it when I start.

Done. I have added a reference image to it as well and plan to make it more comprehensively sourced.

https://wazeopedia.waze.com/wiki/Australia/Australian_Place_Style_Guide

I’ve been mapping the area place boundaries differently to what the wiki shows by mapping to the segment, which is what was recommended by Glomp.

Should I correct the ones that I have done that way to match the wiki? Unfortunately I have lost some of my area, so I can’t access some of it anymore.

As long as it comes back far enough so that it’s not interfering with segment nodes, it should be fine, but try to bring it back a little more just for consistency with the wiki. If you don’t have access to it anymore, don’t worry too much.

Should the wiki also include the level that linking to external places becomes available? Otherwise, I think that you’ve done a good job

https://wazeopedia.waze.com/wiki/Australia/Australian_Place_Style_Guide#Common_Issues

Did this last night.

I have added a table of Places / Categories, and the associated Locking levels for each.

Please review this, as it was easier to submit it there instead of the forums. Is there anything we need to add / tweak about this?

https://wazeopedia.waze.com/wiki/Australia/Australian_Place_Style_Guide#Table_of_Places