Excellent, thanks for implementing this. The angle is often hidden under the segments, so a dedicated colour helps a lot!
For people that think it doesn’t work yet (like me in first instance), don’t forget to disable the “old” Chrome extension
EDIT: just noticed a 168.6 angle gets purple as well.
But on the angles I’ve done tests with, (without checking the first decimal), a 169 angle still gave a turn left. A 170 degr was a uturn prompt.
The u-turn angle in use currently is 168.24 with a “gray zone” ±0.2 degrees.
These values are based on my multiple map experiments performed last week.
The recent series of these experiments is still on the map and all examples matches the current values:
The anomalies - which were a basis for a gray (in fact yellow ) zone approximation - has been observed so far just for the two unselected examples in the above picture.
Could you post the permalinks to examples you mention that violates current rules?
Together we can find better approximation of a u-turn and/or a gray zone angles.
ok, that looks different from my experience.
When it was first introduced I set up some different angles where I drive to work. testing in the app showed 169 didnt work, 170 did. Livemap routing did not have uturns enabled then. After that I didn’t perfom any tests on angles lower then 170. I guess waze is still “improving” it.
I have been very much enjoying the new turn instruction prediction in JAI. I found a case where JAI does not reach the same conclusion on BC as the mobile app or route checker:
Thanks for posting. This is line with the recently announced changes to the BC algorithm. The algorithm is being simplified so any name (primary or alternate) is given equal weight.
The changes in the routing instruction estimation algorithm still requires further testing (all implemented conditions are rather my guessing than knowledge ), but all the cases tested so far looks promising.
After trying the latest development version, I found wild rapid ‘scrolling’ when attempting to click and drag to move the view.
So, turned it off and turned regular JAI on, F5 to load, and all works normally now so, there may be a conflict of some kind.
I’m not aware of any changes in JAI that could cause such a strange behaviour.
I personally experienced “rapid scrolling” even without any addon enabled, thus maybe it just coincidentally happened to you after installing JAI.
Did you try F5 having only JAI development version enabled?
If the problem persists please describe closer your environment (the browser version, what other addons are used etc.).
I’m currently using latest JAI development version and it works without any problems in Chrome and Firefox with over 20 other WME addons enabled.