The turn restriction for segment 22908313 going west should be allowed.
https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&lat=42.28458&lon=-71.61787&layers=BFTFTTTTTTFTTTTTTTTTFT&segments=22908313
Similarly Segment 61620729 should be allowed to continue east.
https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&lat=42.28458&lon=-71.61787&layers=BFTFTTTTTTFTTTTTTTTTFT&segments=61620729
Any assistance one could offer in resolving this situation would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Supernovareborn
Ah yes, good old Route 9. I most likely missed those turn restrictions during my most recent un-split of that section. :-/ Fixed. Now putting back missing alt names.
https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&lat=42.28498&lon=-71.61406&layers=BFTFTTTTTTFTTTTTTTTTFT&segments=22908313
This segment needs it’s turn restrictions adjusted slightly as well. I commute back and forth from framingham to worcester 5 days a week if there is anything I can do to help in this area feel free to PM me.
-Supernovareborn
Yup, obviously the straight-ahead “turn” should have been enabled, along with the right turn coming from the other direction. (Done.)
Getting all the turn restrictions right is one of the reasons that un-splitting a road is labor-intensive and error-prone. Ironically, not wanting to have to un-split Route 9 for a third time is the reason that I locked it. So it serves me right to have to fix them myself, but at least this will be the last time.
It’s a good thing you did lock it. The person who split that segment this last time didn’t even finish enough to make the road usable. I really appreciate all the hard work you’ve put into things. For the most part the roads I’ve traveled in MA have been pretty good.
Thank you! It hadn’t struck me until now that most of the feedback editors get about their work is negative; Wazers rarely use the Report Map Problem to congratulate you on a job well done.
That’s the way it goes for any job that anyone does…believe me, I know 