Hi all
It appears that waze HQ are on a tidy up mission for NZ.
(Update)
The goal is
The city field = City or Town only
Between city’s leave tick “none”
But for now many of our major cities have suburbs in the city field. For now we should leave them until the Waze database is updated.
ispyisail
This is for when the suburb field is implemented, right?
Not right now ?
That’s not my understanding
Email Extract
I was just thinking that if we implemented it in Auckland right now without the surburb field (ie. Change all streets in Auckland to have ‘City: Auckland’) we’re going to lose a lot of suburb info, and would take longer/require more effort restoring that information once the suburb field is implemented in the WME.
darquel:
I was just thinking that if we implemented it in Auckland right now without the surburb field (ie. Change all streets in Auckland to have ‘City: Auckland’) we’re going to lose a lot of suburb info, and would take longer/require more effort restoring that information once the suburb field is implemented in the WME.
yeah
I’m staying away from Auckland for now
When you get level 5/6 we have tools that can do mass changes. Adding suburbs back is easy with these tools.
In about 30 minutes I removed all suburbs from Christchurch
I really think we should leave the suburb data as is, until Waze have a replacement. Loosing all that info would be a pain, both for the client users searching for an address, and for editing the suburbs back in later on.
Great South Road as an example I can think of right now…
ps_au
January 27, 2014, 5:27am
7
Strangely enough I put that question to the Waze staff yesterday (re Gt South Rd)…
I haven’t got a reply on that one yet…
Update
The call has been made not to make any changes to the existing city structures until a waze infrastructure change.
ps_au:
Ok, just to clarify what ispyisail is saying:
Leave the suburbs in metropolitan areas as they are. So for example, Gt South Rd… City=“Ellerslie” or whatever suburb its travelling through at the time. Try to steer away from just calling the City name “Auckland” or “Wellington” etc, as this is just being lazy… Use the Surburb name in the City field (just as you have done in the past)
ONLY Rural Areas (and we have a lot of them in NZ) are you permitted to TICK the “City” name to Null if you cannot find a Suburb for it. “Street” Names are still a requirement.
Waze are in the worldwide process of updating City/State boundaries which is a big project. This in turn should address any remaining smudges.
I’m actually still a little confused myself.
When I have time I will seek more clarification.
Good grief.
Sometimes I think the Waze people are so nebulous with their “plans”, that they don’t really realise the impact it has on usage.
Thanks for the
It my opinion it does indicate intent…
In my opinion now that Google does the location searching the “suburb” vs “city” argument is somewhat lessoned.